Proposed Cycling Infrastructure at Downsview Park

4 marca 2010 - admin

The latest and last Secondary Plan Review Community Meeting was held at North York Civic Center Council Chambers on September 14.

OF THE PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE

  1. path along the proposed Transit Road extension. If built, this extension would butt right up to the existing airport lands in the park. The Right -of-Way (ROW) diagram for the road shows the following usage of the roadway:
    1. DND Bombardier boundary (i.e., the road butts right up to the airport lands)
    2. 2.65m of planting and furniture
    3. 2.10m sidewalk
    4. two 1.60m lanes (the lanes are side-by-side, so they may simply consist of a 3.2m width strip of asphalt)
    5. 2.65m planting and furniture
    6. four lanes of traffic (two lanes each direction with no median)
  2. The December entry mentions the City would not be extending Grand Ravine east of Keele Street. However, the current plans show a proposal for a 4-lane road from Keele to the proposed subway/GO station. lanes are planned for both sides of the road. Grand Ravine already exists running west of Keele.
  3. A wide multi-use pathway is planned along the southern and eastern perimeter of the actual parklands. This pathway would be physically separated from the road and would be shared with other forms of active transportation such as walking and roller-blading.
  4. There will likely be recreational pathways criss-crossing through the park. But this is determined by the Parc Downsview Parc corporation, not the City of .

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADVOCACY

  1. Multi-use pathways should be built so that cyclists are physically separated from other forms of transportation (eg. pedestrians, dog-walkers). For example, the final design of the through Marilyn Bell Park has separate areas for bicycles and pedestrians. Also, the lanes are asphalt, and the pedestrian area will be covered with another stone.
  2. Development of a path parallel to the CN tracks, all the way to the Kay Gardiner belt-line trail. Part of this is outside the scope of the Secondary Plan, but still worthwhile pursuing. For now, they could consider building this path from Sheppard to Wilson Avenue.

NEXT STEPS:

  1. Public review and comment are due October 5th, 2009. You can send any comments you have to this address:
    North York District
    Community Planning Office
    North York Civic Centre
    5100 Yonge Street
    , Ontario M2N 5V7
  2. Submission to North York Community Council on November 10 this year.
  3. Report and recommendation to full Council by the end of the year.

You can find more details on the planned Road, Transit, and Pedestrian and Networks at http://www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/Downsview_MeetingPanels_Sept14_3.pdf and http://www.toronto.ca/planning/downsview.htm

Kategoria Bez kategorii | Komentarze »

Volvo Ocean Race " Leg Six Week One summary

18 kwietnia 2009 - admin

The first points of leg six of the Volvo Ocean have now been earned, and early yesterday evening, just before darkness fell, Telefnica Blue claimed the maximum of four points as she led the seven-strong Volvo fleet through the gate at Fernando…

Kategoria Bez kategorii | Komentarze »

Downsview Park Development could include cycling lanes and paths

24 marca 2009 - admin

There are plans underway for the new Downsview Park that could potentially offer cyclists car-free recreational riding / commuting from Sheppard Avenue (between Allan Road and Keele Street) south to Eglinton Street (almost). In fact, the development of the Downsview Park may act as a catalyst for even more extensive paths as follows:

  • along the Finch Hydro corridor, just north of Finch Avenue
  • On street from the corridor to the top of Downsview Park, at Sheppard Avenue
  • Up to 10m wide parallel to north-south road tracks (CN Newmarket sub) through Downsview Park to just north of Eglinton Avenue
  • Connection with Kay Gardiner Belt-line trail running east-west to Mount Pleasant cemetery

There is an opportunity for you to be involved on December 8th and 16th where the Secondary Plan for this park will be presented and feedback will be collected on the plan and the alternatives contained in it.

Originally, development of these and paths were fully described and costed in the late nineties report entitled “Pre-Engineering / Cost Assessment of Trail Opportunities in and Hydro Corridors”.

In addition to infrastructure in the area, there are also plans to build both TTC and GO stations in the northern section of the Park. This development reinforces sustainability in the sense that private automobile traffic is discouraged and , walking, and public transportation traffic is optimized.

The Downsview Lands were previously used as a military base (CFB Downsview) until 1994 when the government announced the closure of the base. Title to 231.5 hectares (572 acres) of the Downsview Lands was transferred to Parc Downsview Park (PDP) in 2006. PDP is an Agent Crown corporation that reports directly to Parliament through its responsible Minister, currently the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.

The PDP has developed Sustainable Community Development Guidelines, to provide a framework for the development of Downsview Park. The PDP mandate / vision includes:

  • Building an urban recreational green space
  • Be self-financing (no annual budget from federal government)
  • Environmental, economic, and social sustainability

More recently, PDP has invited the City of to be a partner in the development of Downsview Park and surrounding area. The City of is now in the middle of a Secondary Plan Review and Zoning update for the area, and has hired the firm planningAlliance (http://www.planningalliance.ca/) to assist with this review. The secondary plan is expected to be complete by June 2009. As a result of the partnership, the plan will:

  • be developed according to the provincial planning act
  • have a hearing with the North York Community Council
  • be approved by City Council

The Sustainable Community Development Guidelines describes in detail different possibilities, including infrastructure. Here is what I like and dont like.

SOME GOOD THINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

  1. Bicycle lanes and generous -friendly vehicle lanes are envisioned on every street within Downsview Park. Bus shelters, sidewalk canopies, shower facilities and preferential bicycle parking should reinforce the usefulness of non-motorized modes of transportation.
  2. Decision making that affects transportation options should favour modes of travel in the following order:
    1. Walking (including assisted mobility devices);
    2. and other non-motorized vehicles;
    3. L ocal trains and buses;
    4. Commuter trains and buses;
    5. Carpooling and car-sharing;
    6. Small, fuel-efficient and/or alternative fuel vehicles;
    7. Conventional cars and trucks.
  3. The design of streets and paths will prioritize walking and , and will ensure connectivity between neighbourhoods, park blocks and public transit.
  4. should be accommodated in all development plans by providing for dedicated routes and secure bicycle parking.
  5. A master plan will be developed in cooperation with the City of to provide bicycle routes throughout Downsview Park which link up with City bicycle routes.

SOME NOT SO GOOD THINGS IN THE DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
(I have put my comments in italics)

  1. A hierarchy of roads that range from collectors to pathways.
    Collectors have too much motorized traffic. I consider it a bad idea to create a short cut for motorized vehicles that will enable them to bypass congested arterial roads like Keele and Allan Road. The road system in Downsview Park park needs to be designed so it is very fast and convenient for cyclists to use it to pass through and very inconvenient (or impossible) for motorists to use it in the same way.
  2. Paths should be a minimum of 3. metres in width to facilitate walking, , wheelchairs, and snow removal vehicles.
    Most new now have a standard width of 4. metres and trails in Downsview Park should be built with this wider width. We also want to emphasize that cyclists do need their own space. Cyclists need to be separated from walkers, wheelchairs, roller bladers, etc; This is especially true for those who want to use the Park as part of a commute.
  3. Innovative public transit solutions should be investigated to link all of the Downsview Park neighbourhoods with the planned subway/GO train station.
    One option may be a bus route operating along the railway right-of-way. One side of the railway right of way should be for cyclists only. The other side can be for buses.

To hear more or to provide your input, you can attend one of two meetings in December about the Secondary Plan in December where City and Downsview staff will discuss Directions for a preferred alternative.

Date: Monday, December 8, 2008
Time: 6:30PM 9:00PM
Location: Downsview Secondary School, 7 Hawksdale Road

You can also provide input by writing to:

Attn: Downsview Secondary Plan Review Team
City Planning
Community Planning, North District
North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge Street
, Ontario M2N 5V7

For more information on these meetings see:
www.pdp.ca/en/corporate/landsPlan.cfm and the second page of www.pdp.ca/media/CommunityNotice17Sep2008.pdf for times and locations of Community meetings about this Plan. The secondary plan is expected to be complete by June 2009.

More information on Downsview Park and the Secondary Plan can be found at these sites:
www.downsviewpark.ca (main website for Downsview Park)
www.pdp.ca/media/PDPCorpPlanSummary.FinalApril21.pdf (Corporate Plan 2008-09 to 2012-13.
www.pdp.ca/media/SustainableCommEN.pdf (Sustainable Community Development Guidelines)
www.tixhub.com/PDP/e-newsletter/index.html (Downsview Park e-Newsletter) www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2008/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-11457.pdf (City of Staff Report, Action Required, March 6, 2008) www.toronto.ca/planning/downsview.htm ( Secondary Plan Review)

Sam Bootsma

Kategoria Bez kategorii | Komentarze »

Handicap Help

24 marca 2009 - admin

This was posted in 2004, but should be helpful for determining handicaps:

FC participants,

As the summer golf heats up, the annual refresher on recording your scores and other key subjects for the are provided…

For the , a minimum of 10 documented, rounds is required. A few ground rules for the FC:

Two separate nine hole rounds can not be added to substitute one round of 18 holes. Players not completing the minimum 10 rounds, will have five (5) strokes deducted from their as listed on the Tracker the night prior to the opening round of the FC.

NEW FOR 2004 FC - The Rules Committee voted for the 2004 season a maximum of +36 is allowed on rounds. For example, if the par is 72, Golfer A shoots a 110 (+38), the highest score Golfer A can is 108.

If you have scores already in the tracker that are affected by this rule, please adjust. accordingly.

The reasoning - the USGA sets a maximum of 36.4 for mens . Allowing scores higher than the max inflates a players .

RULES OF GOLF

There are a few penalties that always generate questions; Out of Bounds, lost ball, and water hazards. Here is a of the three.

Out of Bounds (know by the code Oscar Bravo as JW calls it) is Stroke and Distance marked on the course by white stakes. OB always surrounds the perimeter of the golf course. The USGA does not recognize OB on the interior of a course, so if your ball is in the junk and it is not on the exterior boundary of the golf course, the ball is either lost or in a hazard… A lost ball is Stroke and Distance.

Stroke & Distance - ex. Ken hits a tee shot OB or into thick rough and cant find the ball. Ken then must re-tee and take a one shot penalty. He would be hitting his third shot (#1-Tee shot, #2-one shot penalty, #3-re-tee).

ex#2. Tim is hitting his second shot on a par5. He hits his shot into thick junk. He cant find the ball. This is a lost ball. He must go back and re-hit. Tim would be hit

Kategoria Bez kategorii | Komentarze »